World Courant
What these proposals have in widespread: They’d go effectively past steps Trump took — or in lots of instances even tried — from 2017 to 2021.
Trump’s marketing campaign has repeatedly dismissed media studies about his potential second-term agenda, saying in a
assertion in November that coverage suggestions from his conservative allies “are definitely appreciated and could be enormously useful” however “are simply that — suggestions.”
“Except a second time period precedence is articulated by President Trump himself, or is formally communicated by the marketing campaign, it isn’t approved in any manner,” the assertion from marketing campaign advisers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita mentioned.
However each supporters and critics of the ex-president predict {that a} reelected Trump would wage a extra centered and aggressive assault on the established order. This time, they are saying, he can be way more educated in regards to the mechanics of wielding government energy. Having positioned so many conservatives in federal judgeships, he would face much less resistance from the courts. And he can be extra decided to put loyalists, not rules-obsessed traditionalists, in senior roles.
Trump’s second time period can be “dramatically extra complete and extra aggressive and extra decided to profoundly change the institution,” mentioned former Republican Home Speaker Newt Gingrich, who wrote a 2017 e book known as “Understanding Trump.” The surface proposals drawing a lot consideration “are value being conscious of,” he mentioned, “as a result of they offer you a way of what it might imply to place Trumpism into impact.”
President Joe Biden’s marketing campaign mentioned voters have to be knowledgeable about proposals that might “undermine democracy, rip away rights and freedoms, and make Individuals’ lives as depressing as humanly doable if Trump is reelected.”
“Individuals ought to know the stakes of this election,” Biden marketing campaign spokesperson Seth Schuster mentioned in an announcement to POLITICO, “and Trump has made them as clear as day.”
These are among the many coverage modifications that each followers and foes of the previous president say folks can count on if Trump wins in November:
A girl holds an anti-abortion placard as supporters of then-President Donald Trump rally exterior the Wilshire Federal Constructing in Los Angeles in June 2019.
|
David McNew/Getty Photos
Banning abortions in pink and blue states
As a candidate, Trump has each claimed credit score for the demise of Roe v. Wade and solid himself as a reasonable on abortion rights — and he has
pissed off anti-abortion teams by refusing to overtly embrace or rule out a nationwide ban.
But those self same teams, in collaboration with veterans of Trump’s earlier administration,
are drafting plans for a sprawling anti-abortion agenda that might all however outlaw the process from coast to coast, together with in states whose legal guidelines or constitutions assure reproductive rights. The proposals would go far past his first-term anti-abortion insurance policies — which Biden has since lifted — and would lean closely on government department actions, bypassing a stymied Congress.
The prospect terrifies abortion rights supporters, who see a second Trump administration as a risk to all of the work they’ve finished over the past two years to
restore and defend abortion entry on the state degree. Their causes for fear grew after The New York Occasions
reported this month that Trump has privately advised aides and supporters that he might help a nationwide abortion ban after the sixteenth week of being pregnant.
“We can not poll initiative our manner out of this basic disaster of rights,” mentioned Deirdre Schifeling, chief political and advocacy officer for the American Civil Liberties Union, certainly one of many teams bracing for Trump and a Republican Congress to try to override state abortion protections. “I’ve little doubt that they’d attempt to impose a federal abortion ban, limit contraception, and do numerous issues which might be manner out of step with what folks on this nation need.”
Anti-abortion activists say they’re assured Trump would a minimum of rescind
all of the Biden insurance policies that expanded entry to each abortion capsules and surgical abortions. These embrace funding for navy members who should journey throughout state traces for an abortion, the availability of abortions at Division of Veterans Affairs clinics, the
enlargement of HIPAA privateness guidelines to cowl abortions, and the power to
obtain abortion capsules by mail and at retail pharmacies.
Reversing Biden’s choices “ought to occur instantly,” Jamie Risks of the group Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America advised reporters throughout a January name. Risks added that she and her fellow conservative advocates additionally count on Trump to reinstate a swath of insurance policies from his first time period, together with restrictions on home and worldwide clinics that present contraception and checks for sexually transmitted ailments, curbs on abortion capsules and cuts to
medical analysis that makes use of fetal tissue obtained from abortions.
However the Supreme Courtroom’s 2022 ruling that
eradicated federal protections for abortion has cleared the way in which for Trump to go a lot additional.
The Heritage Basis’s 2025 Presidential Transition Mission — a coalition led by former Trump administration officers that features teams comparable to College students for Life and Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America — is brainstorming methods to make use of government energy to chop off entry to each abortion capsules and the surgical process. Additionally they wish to funnel taxpayer {dollars} to organizations that work to discourage folks from terminating a being pregnant.
The
Mission 2025 manifesto consists of plans, for instance, for Trump to revoke the Meals and Drug Administration’s two-decade-old approval of mifepristone — a drug utilized in most abortions. The teams are additionally relying on Trump implementing a
long-dormant regulation from the 1870s to punish anybody who sends or receives both mifepristone or medical gear used for abortions by way of the mail. Taken collectively, these two insurance policies might quantity to a de facto nationwide abortion ban.
“Of the varied proposals, FDA revocation of mifepristone approval can be the heaviest elevate,” acknowledged Roger Severino, a former Trump administration official on the Division of Well being and Human Providers and a pacesetter of Mission 2025. Severino added that narrower however nonetheless sweeping restrictions on the drug, comparable to reinstating the requirement that folks obtain it solely in-person from a health care provider, are “the extra seemingly consequence.”
Mission 2025 and different conservative teams are additionally pushing for a future Trump administration to rescind Biden Justice Division steering that
requires hospitals to supply abortions to sufferers experiencing medical emergencies no matter state bans on the process — a problem the Supreme Courtroom is
set to contemplate this 12 months.
These regulatory and coverage modifications would virtually definitely face authorized challenges, although the Trump administration’s earlier appointments of tons of of conservative judges might imply a extra pleasant reception and fewer restraints on the White Home than courts gave his first administration. Such coverage strikes additionally would make certain to exacerbate the political backlash Republicans have confronted because the fall of Roe and will increase Democratic turnout in future races.
— Alice Miranda Ollstein
President Donald Trump’s Oval Workplace show of a crudely altered hurricane map was “Sharpiegate” — a 2019 flap that some noticed as typifying his method to science and disinformation.
|
Evan Vucci/AP Picture
Neutering local weather science
Trump spent his first time period shredding the Obama administration’s environmental rules, put fossil gas lobbyists answerable for key companies and withdrew from the Paris Local weather Settlement — making the U.S. the one nation on the earth to reject the landmark pact.
For the sequel, his supporters need Trump to go after federal local weather science itself — and guarantee it may well’t be used to information authorities insurance policies.
Trump not solely
declined to go to date throughout his first time period, however his companies continued to place out local weather assessments that
declared warming temperatures a risk to the nation’s future. Eight days earlier than his time period ended, his White Home science workplace even fired partisan researchers who had tried to inject cherry-picked local weather science into the federal government report.
Now, as he assaults Biden’s environmental insurance policies as a
“Inexperienced New Rip-off” and escalates his
assaults on wind generators, Trump’s supporters count on him to take the combat towards federal local weather insurance policies a notch greater.
Mission 2025
lays out proposals for the subsequent conservative administration to reject the many years of analysis that present the more and more dire penalties of rising carbon dioxide ranges. It could flip key authorities companies such because the EPA towards rising fossil gas manufacturing slightly than public well being protections.
The Heritage venture even proposes eliminating one of many world’s main science our bodies, the Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, calling it “one of many foremost drivers of the local weather change alarm {industry}.”
That might have a big ripple impact and alter the way in which the federal government prepares the nation for lethal warmth waves, wildfires and flooding. NOAA’s companies, together with the Nationwide Climate Service, might discover themselves “eradicated, despatched to different companies, privatized or positioned underneath the management of states and territories,” the plan says.
As well as, the plan would block the Pentagon from utilizing local weather analysis to form its operations and readiness — a longtime goal of complaints from GOP lawmakers, who preserve that such efforts shift the navy away from its important mission. The navy has lengthy included local weather science,
together with throughout Trump’s first time period, to
harden its amenities and bases towards rising sea ranges and extra excessive storms.
Will Happer, a former adviser on Trump’s Nationwide Safety Council, advised POLITICO earlier this 12 months that the ex-president had expressed hopes of reviving a never-accomplished proposal from his first time period — one that might have broadly restructured federal local weather science and embedded like-minded researchers into the staffs writing local weather research.
Happer mentioned that earlier than leaving workplace, Trump advised him: “Let’s do that in my second time period.”
— Scott Waldman
Workers work on an meeting line producing audio system at a manufacturing unit in China’s jap Anhui province on June 30.
|
STR/AFP through Getty Photos
Increasing commerce fights towards rivals — and allies
Trump has made no secret that he intends to pursue a dramatic escalation of his “America First” commerce agenda if reelected, ratcheting up tariffs and different commerce obstacles towards each U.S. enemies and allies — far greater than the degrees he enacted throughout his first time period.
As earlier than, certainly one of his foremost targets can be China.
Trump imposed tariffs on greater than $300 billion value of Chinese language items after successful the White Home in 2016, duties the Biden administration has largely left in place. However the former president has vowed to go a lot additional by eliminating China’s “most favored nation” commerce standing, which might result in stiff tariffs on a variety of economic items, comparable to smartphones, and certain set off large retaliation.
“Financial safety is nationwide safety,”
Trump mentioned in a coverage video in January 2023. “China doesn’t enable American corporations to take over their crucial infrastructure — and America mustn’t enable China to take over our crucial infrastructure.”
“If we don’t do that, america might be owned by China, which might make them very glad,” he added.
Trump has additionally mentioned he would impose a “four-year plan to
part out all Chinese language imports of important items — every thing from electronics to metal to prescription drugs,” and create new guidelines to dam U.S. corporations from making investments in China.
The proposals, which might seemingly violate international buying and selling guidelines, face fierce pushback from {industry} and would result in greater costs for shoppers on a variety of products, financial specialists warn. However supporters argue that the hawkish positions are mandatory to reply to nationwide safety threats posed by China, in addition to its coercive regional affect.
The Republican front-runner can be contemplating levying a flat 60 p.c tariff on all Chinese language imports,
The Washington Submit reported final month. When Fox Enterprise requested him in regards to the studies,
Trump declined to decide to particular figures however mentioned tariffs on China might even be greater.
Trump has additionally floated the thought of setting a ten p.c “common baseline” tariff, telling Fox Enterprise Information in August that it might apply “robotically” for all nations. (He didn’t rule out together with U.S. buying and selling companions in these penalties.) That might dramatically elevate the prices of imports coming into the U.S., which might promote home {industry} however would additionally symbolize a big burden to American shoppers and firms that depend on international items and supplies.
— Ari Hawkins
Banned books from across the nation are on show in a public library in Brooklyn, New York, in July 2022.
|
Ted Shaffery/AP
Waging classroom tradition wars
Efforts by Republican governors and college boards to limit instructing on topics like race, sexuality and gender identification have mushroomed since Trump left the White Home, as have GOP makes an attempt to roll again protections for transgender college students. And Trump is promising that he and his Schooling Division would develop that combat.
His
newest training plan requires slicing federal funding for any faculty or program that features “crucial race principle, gender ideology, or different inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content material onto our youngsters.” He additionally needs to open civil rights investigations into faculties “engaged in race-based discrimination” and has promised to “maintain males out of ladies’s sports activities.”
“If any instructor or faculty official suggests to a toddler that they may very well be trapped within the mistaken physique, they are going to be confronted with extreme penalties,” Trump mentioned in a
video assertion posted final 12 months. As an alternative, he mentioned his training officers would “promote optimistic training … celebrating slightly than erasing the issues that make women and men totally different and distinctive.”
The Schooling Division’s Workplace for Civil Rights might additionally dismantle discrimination protections for transgender college students and reinstate its regulation on how faculties should reply to sexual misconduct — which might be the third regulatory change to Title IX in three administrations.
The primary Trump administration equally rolled again Obama-era steering defending transgender college students and launched investigations into faculties that allowed transgender athletes to play on ladies’s sports activities groups — nevertheless it didn’t codify a ban on transgender college students from amenities nor sports activities. Whereas the Schooling Division threatened to drag federal funding from faculties that ran afoul of its transgender insurance policies, it by no means did.
Civil rights teams have mentioned they’re deeply involved about Trump rolling again protections for a number of the nation’s most susceptible college students.
Trump’s training officers would have a more durable time implementing this agenda if the Biden administration finishes a regulation codifying protections for gender identification this 12 months. In that case, it might most likely take years for a second Trump administration to overtake Biden’s rules, reinstate outdated Trump-era insurance policies and add new ones.
— Bianca Quilantan
Vitality Secretary Jennifer Granholm take a look at drives a Chevy Bolt EUV electrical automobile throughout a go to to the Washington Auto Present in 2023.
|
Andrew Harnik/AP
Making an attempt to kill the electrical automotive
Electrical automobiles didn’t get a lot consideration from Trump throughout his first time period. This time he’s making no secret of his disdain for the know-how, even issuing a
Christmas greeting on social media that known as for supporters of the “All Electrical Automotive Lunacy” to “ROT IN HELL.”
If he defeats Biden, Trump would have important leeway to place authorized pressure behind his assaults.
Trump pledged throughout
a rally in January that “on day one” he would halt an upcoming EPA auto-pollution rule that’s
geared toward driving EV adoption, falsely calling it an “electrical automobile mandate.” He has additionally
vowed to undo Biden’s aggressive proposal to extend federal gas financial system requirements. Even earlier than Trump takes workplace, the Supreme Courtroom might ease his path to reversing these guidelines by
overturning the authorized doctrine underpinning them.
Heritage’s 2025 Mission additionally encourages Trump to as soon as once more go after the federal waiver authority that
permits California to set its personal automobile requirements, which it and different states have used to set guidelines ordering the phaseout of gasoline-powered automobiles. Trump
blocked the state’s waiver in 2019, however the Biden administration quickly restored it.
The prospect of one other Trump presidency might have an effect even earlier than the election by chilling corporations’ investments in electrical automobiles, mentioned Levi Tillemann, a former Obama-era Vitality Division official and writer of “The Nice Race: The World Quest for the Automotive of the Future.” Tillemann famous that automakers typically function on 10-year horizons.
Already, automakers and suppliers are throttling again some EV funding as
demand for the battery-powered automobiles slows.
Supporters of the EV transition vow to be prepared for the combat.
“If President Trump turns into president once more, we’re going to see the identical sorts of actions the place they’ll attempt to roll again and take away California’s authority, however we’re not giving up,” Patty Monahan, lead commissioner on transportation for the California Vitality Fee, mentioned at a latest convention.
Trump
has additionally promised to “cease the movement of American tax {dollars} which might be subsidizing Chinese language electrical automobile battery corporations” by additional limiting the buyer tax credit score that
gives as much as $7,500 to EV consumers. Trump might difficulty stricter interpretations of guidelines that
tie the credit score to the home sourcing of minerals, sharply limiting the variety of automobiles that qualify, Tillemann mentioned.
One other space the place Trump might unilaterally gradual EV deployment is within the federal authorities’s personal fleet, which Biden has moved to quickly electrify. “The worst factor is that they wish to make our Military tanks all electrical,” Trump mentioned at a rally in December.
What may very well be more durable for Trump to claw again — each legally and politically — are Biden’s federal subsidies which have
spurred billions of {dollars} in funding within the battery provide chain and charging infrastructure throughout the nation. Many of the funds in 2021’s bipartisan infrastructure regulation could have flowed out by 2025, and far of that funding — and the roles that include it — goes to states that again Trump, which have
welcomed EV producers with open arms.
Nonetheless-unspent cash from 2022’s Inflation Discount Act, which supplied a minimum of $369 billion in clear power subsidies, may very well be extra susceptible to Trump, who might use rules to closely limit the place the funds can movement.
Tim Echols, a Republican who serves as vice chair of Georgia’s elected Public Service Fee, mentioned repealing the IRA might “finish the surge of progress in EV-related companies” in his state. “It’s definitely our hope that we’re capable of end what we’ve began and that President Trump will place a excessive worth on manufacturing stateside,” he mentioned.
— James Bikales
An election employee removes tabulated ballots from a machine contained in the Maricopa County Recorder’s Workplace in Phoenix in November 2022.
|
Matt York/AP
Neutering the federal election hacking watchdog
Trump’s false claims that Biden-aligned hackers had stolen the 2020 election acquired a vigorous debunking from a supply near residence — the cyber company in Trump’s personal Division of Homeland Safety.
In a second time period, Trump would have the chance to pack DHS’ Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company with loyalists bent on giving up the combat towards on-line disinformation.
The roughly five-year-old company, charged with defending delicate U.S. networks from hacks and bodily threats, has grown quickly since Trump first set it up in 2018. However he and different conservative critics on and off Capitol Hill soured on CISA ever since its then-director, Chris Krebs, publicly rebutted the previous president’s allegations of widespread electoral fraud in 2020.
Trump
fired Krebs in mid-November 2020, objecting to a CISA-issued assertion wherein a number of high election officers declared that month’s election to be “essentially the most safe in American historical past.”
CISA stays beset by assaults from conservatives. These embrace a pending lawsuit from Republican attorneys basic alleging that CISA and different authorities companies had silenced conservative voices on-line within the run-up to that election and in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic — accusations CISA denies.
Already, the Republican strain has prompted CISA to curtail its disinformation work.
As an indication of the place Trump might go in a second time period, far-right lawmakers within the Home launched a failed bid to chop CISA’s $2 billion finances by 1 / 4 final fall, although solely a tiny fraction of that cash goes to combating on-line hoaxes. (The remainder goes to duties comparable to providing cybersecurity help to hacking targets comparable to faculties, pipelines and hospitals. ) In 2022, The Heritage Basis launched a highway map calling on the subsequent GOP president to radically restrict CISA’s mandate.
— John Sakellariadis
A Mexican soldier in Zacatecas state stands subsequent to graffiti for the Sinaloa drug cartel and its chief Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada in March 2022.
|
Pedro Pardo/AFP through Getty Photos
Bombing Mexico?
Deploying U.S. troops towards Individuals
4 years in the past, Trump held again from invoking the Rebel Act to deploy federal troops to interior cities the place protesters took to the streets after the police killing of George Floyd.
He has mentioned he gained’t maintain again once more.
“And one of many different issues I’ll do — since you’re imagined to not be concerned in that — you simply should be requested by the governor or the mayor to return in,” Trump
advised an Iowa viewers in November. “The following time, I’m not ready.”
He didn’t provide particulars or how precisely he may use the troops, however within the Iowa look he known as the Democratically run cities New York and Chicago “crime dens.”
Civil rights activists and Democratic lawmakers name his remarks alarming as a result of it’s typically unlawful to make use of the navy for home regulation enforcement. However the 1792 regulation permits an exception for the president to take action to suppress a riot or violence.
Critics say the statute is overbroad, and a few are attempting to rein it in earlier than Trump would have an opportunity to make use of it.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a senior member of the Homeland, Armed Providers and Judiciary committees, has been looking for Republicans and Democrats to hitch his newest effort to overtake the Rebel Act. He mentioned he’s working with the Brennan Middle for Justice, which has additionally proposed narrowing the regulation amid fears Trump might use it to quash any public protests towards him.
Not less than certainly one of Trump’s allies in Congress has voiced sympathy for deploying the navy this manner: Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) created a stir in 2020 with
an opinion piece for The New York Occasions that known as for Trump to make use of the navy to again up native police and put down the unrest.
“One factor above all else will restore order to our streets: an amazing present of pressure to disperse, detain and in the end deter lawbreakers,” wrote Cotton, a member of the Senate Armed Providers Committee.
Cotton extra not too long ago declined to remark to POLITICO.
— Joe Gould
President Donald Trump speaks throughout a gathering with NATO Secretary-Basic Jens Stoltenberg in December 2019 in London.
|
Nicholas Kamm/AFP through Getty Photos
Abandoning NATO
Trump stirred up a transatlantic storm this month when he mentioned he would
“encourage” Russian assaults on NATO allies that fail to spend sufficient on protection.
But it surely was removed from the primary time that he had expressed derision for one of many alliance’s most solemn obligations — that its nations come to assistance from one other member dealing with navy assault.
Throughout his first marketing campaign in 2016, Trump
advised The New York Occasions that he’d defend fellow NATO nations provided that they’ve “fulfilled their obligations to us.” As president two years later, he
warned throughout a NATO summit in Brussels that allies would face “grave penalties” if they didn’t ramp up their spending, and that the U.S. might “go our personal manner” — phrases some leaders interpreted as a risk to withdraw from the alliance. He’s additionally
dismissed NATO as “out of date.”
If reelected, he may actually pull out this time, his former nationwide safety adviser John Bolton mentioned on MSNBC amid the
furor over Trump’s most up-to-date remarks.
“When he says he needs to get out of NATO, I believe it’s a really actual risk, and it’ll have dramatically adverse implications for america, not simply within the North Atlantic, however worldwide,” Bolton mentioned. A U.S. withdrawal would improve Russian leverage in Europe, the place Vladimir Putin’s warfare in Ukraine has introduced Moscow’s troops almost to NATO’s doorstep.
Trump has already put actual pressure behind his complaints.
In the summertime of 2020, he shocked Europe by
ordering the Pentagon to withdraw 12,000 troops from Germany over his anger about Berlin’s protection spending. The order would have introduced 6,400 service members residence and repositioned almost 5,600 to different nations in Europe, leaving 24,000 troops in Germany.
“They’re there to guard Europe. They’re there to guard Germany, proper?” Trump mentioned on the time. “And Germany is meant to pay for it. Germany’s not paying for it. We don’t wish to be the suckers anymore.”
Pentagon officers acknowledged that the strikes, which would come with having to construct new basing elsewhere in Europe and the U.S., would value billions and take years to implement.
The Biden administration
halted the troop drawdown, then killed it.
Trump’s complaints about NATO embrace the truth that a few of its 31 members are failing to fulfill a goal of
spending a minimum of 2 p.c of their gross home product on protection, whereas america spends way more. (He has claimed which means
nations comparable to Germany owe the U.S. “huge sums of cash.”)
Germany nonetheless spends effectively under that threshold, despite the fact that it has donated billions value of weapons and munitions to Ukraine. It’s not anticipated to succeed in that mark till 2025 on the earliest.
Lawmakers late final 12 months put up a guardrail when it authorized a provision within the Nationwide Protection Authorization Act that might bar any future president from pulling out of NATO with out Congress’ approval.
But Trump might nonetheless deeply weaken the NATO alliance just by refusing to take part, mentioned Jim Townsend, a former Pentagon and NATO official on the Middle for a New American Safety.
“He might simply downgrade our participation by not having an envoy go to NATO headquarters, and he gained’t go to summits and the secretary of protection gained’t go to protection ministerials” at NATO, Townsend mentioned. “U.S. management will drop out and also you simply gained’t see loads of American faces.”
— Paul McLeary
A picture of bitcoin and U.S. forex flashes on a display screen throughout 2017’s Interpol World Congress in Singapore.
|
Roslan Rahman/AFP through Getty Photos
Loosening the reins on crypto
Trump was a cryptocurrency skeptic throughout his presidency. GOP lawmakers and conservative teams count on a second time period
might flip him right into a crypto savior.
They’ve drafted regulatory proposals and floated personnel strikes that might be a lot friendlier to the digital asset {industry} than Biden, whose appointees have sought to crack down on the {industry} over shopper safety issues.
The proposals would additionally symbolize a departure for Trump, who disparaged the know-how when he was in workplace final time —
writing on X (then Twitter): “I’m not a fan of Bitcoin and different Cryptocurrencies, which aren’t cash, and whose worth is extremely risky and based mostly on skinny air.” His administration took a skeptical method to the then-nascent {industry}, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin
elevating issues about crypto.
However since leaving workplace, Trump has
invested in crypto and
dabbled in non-fungible tokens, or NFTs. In the meantime, pro-crypto insurance policies have develop into a precedence for key Republicans on Capitol Hill who’ve pushed for industry-blessed regulatory modifications that would assist legitimize digital belongings.
“If the second Trump administration takes place, [the] president might be much more pleasant to the crypto {industry},” Home Majority Whip Tom Emmer
(R-Minn.), a Trump backer who’s a number one crypto proponent in Congress, mentioned in an interview in January.
Trade critics agree — however name it worrisome.
“The one cheap expectation is that Trump will carry his general monetary deregulation mindset to the crypto area,” mentioned Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of the monetary watchdog group Higher Markets. “It’s going to be to the intense drawback of buyers and prospects — and in the end, in our view, for monetary stability.”
— Jasper Goodman
Past shock and awe: Inside Trump’s potential second-term agenda
World Information,Subsequent Massive Factor in Public Knowledg
