World Courant
Pedro Ramón Fernández Torres (57), alias “El Carnicero”, selected Monday to talk for the primary time within the trial towards him for the crime of the Spanish businessman Roberto Fernández Montes, which occurred in Caballito in 2017. He served 5 years as a refugee in his house nation of Paraguay and stated he was deceived by Santiago Corona, the sufferer’s former son-in-law, and that the unique concept was to commit a theft. And eventually Corona killed his father-in-law from behind and he needed to “threaten” him to assist him conceal the physique.
Prosecutor Juan Manuel Fernández Buzzi didn’t consider any of this relating to “El Carnicero” and requested this Wednesday throughout arguments that he be sentenced to life imprisonment. Within the Corona case, the utmost penalty was imposed in December 2017.
In his argument earlier than the Oral Legal Courtroom (TOC) 5 of the Federal Capital, the trial lawyer recognized Fernández Torres as an confederate in a “homicide aggravated by treason” and guaranteed that he had denied his involvement within the homicide dedicated two days in the past. “he lied” with the goal of “enhancing his procedural scenario” and solely being convicted of “a theft”.
Earlier than the judges Cintia Oberlander, Alejandro Nocetti and Juan Manuel Grangeat, the prosecutor thought of it confirmed that “on January 21, 2017, between 12:10 and 1:31 p.m.,” each the Paraguayan defendant and his former son-in-law Fernández Montes had killed his Aranguren 36. house as a part of a “pre-arranged prison plan”.
Throughout his argument, Fernández Buzzi paid nice consideration to the movies from the constructing’s cameras, which the defendants believed weren’t working and which had been key to the investigation, since they recorded the 2 with the physique wrapped in sheets and lined in blood – and ran out of padding and transported it to the storage to retailer it within the trunk of the sufferer’s automotive.
In regards to the confession that “El Carnicero” made that the incident “was a theft” and that he was in the end “deceived” and “threatened” by Corona, who he stated killed him from behind and would stab the sufferer in a small room the place he locked him, the prosecutor stated: “It’s a late, opportunistic and partly false model.”
Pedro Fernandez Torres was arrested in Paraguay final yr after being on the run from Argentine justice for nearly 5 years.
“It is not a confession, it is clearly a reduction to place your self in a greater scenario,” he added.
“He stated that he helped him take away the physique as a result of Corona threatened him, that they knew the place his daughters went to high school and he felt intimidated. However within the video we noticed, he did not appear nervous, intimidated or scared.” “He’s seen with the identical consideration and pressure as Corona,” stated the state ministry consultant.
In one other a part of the argument, Fernández Buzzi opined that it was additionally a lie because the defendant stated that the unique concept was only a theft and claimed that the defendant really knew that “the plan was to “To kill Fernández Torres,” as a result of, pondering that the cameras within the constructing weren’t working, they determined to not conceal their faces as a precaution.
“Neither Corona nor he lined their faces as a result of they believed that the cameras wouldn’t catch them and the sufferer didn’t matter as a result of he could be useless,” the prosecutor stated.
“If the cameras had not labored the best way they thought, this crime in all probability would have been unsolved or would have been very troublesome to unravel,” the prosecutor stated, once more citing the cameras as the principle proof within the case.
As well as, he dominated out the veracity of the model that Fernández Montes was stabbed, because the defendant stated, and defined that the forensic physician who carried out the post-mortem said on the trial that the few and charred stays, What was left of the sufferer was one thing No “penetrating wounds” had been discovered and, primarily based on further research, the principle speculation about the reason for the businessman’s demise was “mechanical asphyxia”.
In return, the prosecutor stated that no matter who really carried out the homicide, each Corona and Fernández Torres had been “partially liable for the act.”
“There was a plan during which these two individuals had been concerned and every performed a job,” stated Fernández Buzzi, explaining that each must be thought of co-authors.
“No matter whether or not one or the opposite dedicated the killing with their very own palms, each are accomplices as a result of each intervened earlier than, throughout and after the execution of the act in a coordinated method and with a purposeful distribution of duties,” he argued.
When coping with the prison classification, he argued that it was a case of “homicide aggravated by treason” as a result of on this case one took benefit of “the helplessness of the sufferer” and “definitely killed” her by utilizing “concealment and “Stalking”. ” “and in an “insidious method.”
He additionally identified that the 2 defendants had “a motive” and defined that “Corona had a motivation to kill Fernández Montes and it was fairly a conflictual relationship” because of the fraud he brought about in his father-in-law’s firm had , whereas Fernández Torres stated that – as he admitted within the listening to – it was “economical” as a result of “he wanted a mortgage and that is why he joined the plan.”
The protection of “El Carnicero” demanded his acquittal for the crime dedicated by the Spanish businessman
Then the official defenders of the defendants, Sofía Lanzilotta and Ramiro Dillon, claimed that that they had requested the “acquittal” of Fernández Torres for the homicide and that, within the different and although the prosecutor had not accused him, they need to solely be accused of the homicide be convicted of theft.
“The one actuality of what occurred in Aranguren 36 on January 21, 2017 is what we all know by means of him. We all know he’s not liable for the homicide he was accused of,” Lanzilotta stated.
“What was coordinated and pre-arranged was a theft. The confession the prosecutor is speaking about is Pedro’s involvement in a theft. Pedro got here in with out gloves or weapons as a result of he did not need to kill anybody. Corona deceived and manipulated him for his macabre plan,” stated the protection lawyer.
In flip, Dillon added that Fernández Torres “dedicated a theft and was in the end pressured to cowl up against the law he didn’t even commit,” and likewise questioned the utmost sentence requested by the prosecutor, stating that “an individual is sentenced to 57 years”. to life imprisonment means condemning them to demise.
On the finish of the negotiations, the courtroom president, Choose Oberlander, concluded the listening to and introduced that the events would be told within the coming days of the date on which the defendant’s final phrases and the studying of the decision would happen. of the ultimate sentence.
The general public prosecutor didn’t consider the “butcher” and requested that he be sentenced to life imprisonment for the Spanish businessman’s crime
America Area Information ,Subsequent Massive Factor in Public Knowledg
