As the fifth anniversary of the revocation of Article 370 approaches, it remains essential to examine the implications of this significant political move about the Illegally Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K). The abrogation of Article 370, which granted special autonomy to the region, has led to a drastic change in its political and social landscape. This analysis focuses on the human rights violations that have occurred since the revocation, the muted international response, the role of jingoism and media narratives, and the impact on local governance and inclusive development.
Human Rights Violations and International Response
Since the revocation of Article 370, Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K) (IIOJ&K) has experienced a significant increase in military presence, with reports indicating that there are now over 900,000 Indian troops stationed in the region. This heavy militarization has been accompanied by severe restrictions on the local population, including extended curfews and communication blackouts.
Nearly 96,292 people have fallen to Indian bullets since Jan 1989 till date in IIOJK, adding India is using draconian laws, including Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA, Public Safety Act (PSA), and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) to stifle political dissent in the territory. Amnesty International has highlighted cases of enforced disappearances and alleged torture of detainees, with at least 300 such cases documented during this period.
Indian Jingoistic Media
The narrative propagated by the Indian state regarding the abrogation of Article 370 has been heavily influenced by nationalistic rhetoric. The government’s portrayal of the region’s unrest as a matter of national security has often overshadowed discussions about the abuse of human rights and the day to day experiences of Kashmiris. This narrative has been instrumental in rallying domestic support for the Government’s actions, while simultaneously stifling dissent and obscuring the complexities of the situation in Kashmir.
Indian media has played a significant role in propagating this narrative, often focusing on the security dimension, while neglecting or downplaying human rights concerns. This jingoistic approach has not only polarized public opinion but also marginalized voices that call for a more nuanced understanding of the region’s issues. The emphasis on nationalism and security has led to a situation, where any criticism of the Government’s actions is often labeled as unpatriotic, thereby curbing meaningful discourse and debate.
Kashmiris’ Right to Self-Determination
The right to self-determination is a fundamental principle enshrined in international law, recognizing the inherent right of all people to freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development. In the context of Illegally Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K), this principle has been a cornerstone of the region’s struggle. The revocation of Article 370 by the Indian government has further fueled the long-standing demand for self-determination among the Kashmiri people, who see this move as an infringement on their autonomy and identity. Despite numerous United Nations resolutions affirming the right of Kashmiris to determine their future, the international community’s response has been largely passive, failing to translate concern into concrete actions that support the region’s aspirations.
The question of whether the world will eventually raise its voice for the Kashmiris remains pressing. The continued silence and inaction of major global powers and international organizations, particularly in the face of documented human rights violations and suppression of civil liberties, suggest a troubling trend of prioritizing geopolitical interests over human rights. However, there is a growing global awareness and advocacy among civil society organizations, activists, and some governments that could potentially shift this dynamic. The challenge lies in translating this awareness into sustained international pressure and diplomatic efforts that not only acknowledge the Kashmiris’ right to self-determination but actively work towards a peaceful resolution that respects their wishes and rights. The hope for the people of IIOJ&K rests on the international community’s willingness to uphold justice and human dignity, rather than allowing them to remain in what has been described as the world’s largest open-air prison.
Pakistan’s Sustained Stance on the Kashmir Issue
Pakistan has consistently maintained that Jammu and Kashmir is a vital part of its national identity and foreign policy agenda. Since the revocation of Article 370, Pakistan has reiterated its unwavering support for the Kashmiri people, emphasizing their right to self-determination as enshrined in various United Nations resolutions. Islamabad views the Indian government’s actions as a violation of international law and an attempt to unilaterally alter the status of the region. Pakistan’s government and its leaders have repeatedly pledged to be the voice of the Kashmiris on all international platforms, advocating for their rights and highlighting the human rights abuses occurring in Illegally Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K).
The fifth anniversary of the revocation of Article 370 serves as a crucial moment to reassess the situation in Illegally Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJ&K). It calls for a more nuanced and comprehensive examination of the region’s human rights situation, the international community’s role, and the broader implications of nationalistic policies. The need for dialogue and a focus on inclusive development cannot be overstated. Addressing the root causes of the ongoing conflict and exploring sustainable solutions requires moving beyond polarized narratives and engaging with the complex realities on the ground.
