International Courant
Within the case, Azerbaijan is accused of glorifying racism and permitting hate speech towards Armenians.
Azerbaijan has referred to as on the UN Worldwide Court docket of Justice to dismiss a case accusing the nation of ethnic cleaning introduced by neighboring and rival Armenia.
Legal professionals for Azerbaijan argued on Monday that the case doesn’t meet the phrases of the United Nations anti-discrimination treaty on which it’s based mostly. In addition they claimed that the Worldwide Court docket of Justice doesn’t have the jurisdiction to rule on the problems raised within the criticism.
The 2 Caucasian nations have disputed the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh for the thirty years because the collapse of the Soviet Union. Yerevan has tried to attract worldwide consideration to the mountainous enclave since Baku took energy in a navy operation in September.
The ICJ case, filed by Armenia in 2021, accuses Azerbaijan of glorifying racism towards and permitting hate speech towards Armenians and destroying Armenian cultural websites. Baku has denied all claims.
The case stems from a 2020 warfare over Nagorno-Karabakh that left greater than 6,600 folks lifeless, one among three large-scale conflicts the pair have fought over the problem.
‘Untimely’
The UN Conference on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination accommodates a clause permitting disputes to be resolved by the Worldwide Court docket of Justice if bilateral talks fail to discover a answer.
Azerbaijan’s consultant Elnur Mammadov claimed to the courtroom that Armenia had did not “enter into negotiations with Azerbaijan in an try and resolve the problem” and that the lawsuit was due to this fact “untimely.”
There have been “restricted negotiations” however Yerevan “didn’t fail to proceed them,” Mammadov stated. “From the start, Armenia had set its sights on initiating these proceedings in courtroom… and utilizing the actual fact of those proceedings to conduct a public media marketing campaign towards Azerbaijan.”
Worldwide regulation professor Stefan Talmon, representing Azerbaijan, added that Armenia “by no means gave the negotiations an opportunity.”
He argued that “with out negotiations and with none actual try at negotiations, that is successfully the top of Armenia’s utility.”
Azerbaijan additionally claimed that many of the allegations within the Armenian case fall exterior the scope of the discrimination treaty, which means the courtroom has no jurisdiction.
Armenia will reply to Azerbaijan’s arguments on Tuesday.
Azerbaijan has additionally filed a case towards Armenia in courtroom for violating the identical treaty. Armenia’s objections to that case can be heard later this month.
The 2020 battle ended with a Russian-brokered ceasefire settlement that granted Azerbaijan management over elements of Nagorno-Karabakh and a few adjoining areas.
Azerbaijan then waged a meteoric navy marketing campaign in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023, inflicting the overwhelming majority of the area’s 120,000 residents to flee.
In December, the 2 sides agreed to start negotiations on a peace treaty. Nonetheless, many residents of Armenia’s border areas have opposed the demarcation effort, seeing it as Azerbaijan’s encroachment on areas they think about theirs.
Azerbaijan calls on the ICJ to dismiss the Armenian ethnic cleaning case | Courts Information
Africa Area Information ,Subsequent Large Factor in Public Knowledg
