International Courant
The principle opposition social gathering calls it the president’s “try to eradicate the constitutional order.”
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has entered a looming authorized disaster, accusing the nation’s highest courtroom of constructing errors and defending an unprecedented legal investigation in opposition to its judges.
Friday’s feedback sparked a debate over the rule of regulation after the Court docket of Cassation this week unexpectedly questioned the authority of the Constitutional Court docket and filed a legal grievance in opposition to the Constitutional Court docket’s judges.
The dispute facilities on jailed lawyer Can Atalay, one among seven defendants sentenced final yr to 18 years in jail as a part of a trial that additionally consists of award-winning philanthropist Osman Kavala sentenced for all times.
Atalay, 47, was allowed to flee jail in Could’s normal elections and was elected to parliament as a member of the left-wing Employees’ Occasion of Turkey (TIP).
The Constitutional Court docket dominated final month that the jailed parliamentarian ought to be launched – a ruling that the enchantment courtroom stated was unconstitutional.
“Sadly, on this level, the Constitutional Court docket has made many errors in a row, which deeply saddens us,” Erdogan advised reporters on a flight again from Uzbekistan, in keeping with a textual content revealed by his workplace on Friday.
“The Constitutional Court docket can not and shouldn’t underestimate the step taken by the Court docket of Cassation on this matter,” he stated.
Turkey’s Bar Affiliation and the primary opposition social gathering denounced the appeals courtroom ruling as an “tried coup”, and lots of of members, lots of them legal professionals in authorized robes, demonstrated within the streets of the capital on Friday as they chanted “justice.”
They marched greater than ten kilometers from the Ankara courthouse to the Ahlatlibel district, the place the Constitutional Court docket and the Court docket of Cassation are situated subsequent to one another.
“Our residents should perceive that this struggle isn’t just a struggle of legal professionals, it’s a struggle for the structure,” stated the top of the Ankara Bar Affiliation, Mustafa Koroglu.
The brand new chief of the primary opposition Republican Folks’s Occasion (CHP), Ozgur Ozel, joined the march in entrance of the Constitutional Court docket constructing and stated the most recent authorized disaster was “an try by Erdogan to overtake the constitutional order ”.
“The President, who derives his energy from the Structure, helps the actions of the Court docket of Cassation, ignoring the Structure. Rulings of the Constitutional Court docket are binding on everybody in keeping with the structure,” Ozel stated, calling on Erdogan to guard the structure.
Erdogan advised his ruling AK Occasion members to again the appeals courtroom problem, showing to focus on some in his ranks who had criticized the measure.
Authorized specialists say the disaster between Turkey’s two most distinguished courts is unprecedented and underlines considerations that the judiciary has bent to Erdogan’s will (File: Dimitris Papamitsos/AP)
‘Degradation of the rule of regulation’
In remarks delivered later at a ceremony in Ankara, Erdogan stated the dispute between the 2 high courts confirmed the necessity for a brand new structure, reflecting his long-standing place that parliament ought to hear the case subsequent yr.
The newest disaster has proven that Erdogan needs “extra management over what occurs in Turkey, together with a justice system that does what he needs, similar to prosecuting and jailing his critics and opponents,” stated analyst Gareth Jenkins.
“His choice is to do issues which might be in accordance with the Structure. That’s the reason he amended the present structure in 2010 and 2017 and is now speaking a few fully new one,” he added.
Authorized specialists stated such a disaster between the nation’s two most distinguished courts was unprecedented and underlined considerations that the judiciary has bent to Erdogan’s will.
It coincided with the European Fee’s publication of an annual report on Turkey’s long-stalled membership of the European Union, wherein it underlined “severe setbacks” in democratic requirements, the rule of regulation and the independence of the judiciary .
The fee additionally stated Turkey didn’t respect the ideas of human rights and elementary freedoms in its “counter-terrorism operations.”
Erdogan criticizes the Supreme Court docket and fuels Turkey’s authorized disaster | Information
Africa Area Information ,Subsequent Large Factor in Public Knowledg
