International Courant
This can be a debate publish. All opinions expressed within the textual content are the accountability of the author. If you wish to take part within the debate, you’ll be able to learn how right here.
Because of Professor Edgar Hertwich of the Norwegian College of Science and Know-how (NTNU) for supporting my critique of Sintef’s analysis report on the hyperlink between Norwegian consumption and wildlife loss.
Hertwich, nevertheless, misunderstood an essential level which I will need to have conveyed just a little obscurely. Let me be clear: it’s fairly doable that Norway’s contribution to nature loss is growing whereas the EU’s is lowering. Sadly, Sintef’s analysis just isn’t credible documentation of this.
The reason being that Sintef’s information utilization is characterised by large-scale carelessness. The researchers’ share calculation was incorrect and so they use present costs the place mounted costs are extra related. Vegar Johansen, common supervisor of Sintef Ocean, writes that databases of the Group for Financial Co-operation and Growth (OECD) most frequently use present costs. This isn’t true: the OECD publishes information in mounted costs in the identical approach as present costs.
The report additionally doesn’t use OECD, however Exiobase. Hertwich helped set up this base. He writes that some information has “some gaps and enter errors.” These typos should be fairly a number of.
Oystein Sjolie
Assistant Professor of Economics, Hogeschool in Binnenland
Information sloppiness within the Sintef report
World Information,Subsequent Large Factor in Public Knowledg
#Information #sloppiness #Sintef #report
