NY v Trump: Protection says prosecutors ‘didn’t meet the burden of proof,’ former president is ‘harmless’

admin

World Courant

Be a part of Fox Information for entry to this content material

You could have reached your most variety of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of cost to proceed studying.

Please enter a legitimate electronic mail deal with.

- Advertisement -

By coming into your electronic mail and pushing proceed, you might be agreeing to Fox Information’ Phrases of Use and Privateness Coverage, which incorporates our Discover of Monetary Incentive. To entry the content material, verify your electronic mail and comply with the directions offered.
Having bother? Click on right here.

Protection attorneys for former President Trump advised the jury Tuesday he’s harmless, didn’t commit any crimes and that Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg “didn’t meet the burden of proof. Interval.” 

Protection lawyer Todd Blanche delivered closing arguments Tuesday after a six-week, historic and unprecedented legal trial of a former president of the US.

Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying enterprise data within the first diploma. He has pleaded not responsible. 

Prosecutors must show past an affordable doubt that Trump falsified data to hide a $130,000 cost to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic performer, within the lead-up to the 2016 election to silence her about an alleged affair with Trump in 2006. The previous president has maintained his innocence.

- Advertisement -

NY V TRUMP: CLOSING ARGUMENTS TO BEGIN AS MERCHAN SKIRTS DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Former President Trump sits within the courtroom throughout his legal trial in New York Metropolis on Might 21, 2024. (Justin Lane/Pool/AFP by way of Getty Photographs)

“Every of you’ll resolve on the finish of this case whether or not President Trump is responsible or not responsible,” Blanche mentioned. 

- Advertisement -

“President Trump is harmless. He didn’t commit any crimes. The district lawyer didn’t meet the burden of proof. Interval,” Blanche mentioned. 

Blanche added that the case is “easy” and it’s “not a responsible verdict.” 

“This case is about paperwork; it’s a paper case,” Blanche mentioned. “This case isn’t about an encounter with Stormy Daniels 18 years in the past. It’s not even a few nondisclosure settlement signed eight years in the past.”

Blanche mentioned the fees are about whether or not Trump “had something” to do with funds to his ex-attorney, Michael Coheny, on his private accounting ledger.

“The reply? The bookings had been correct and there was no intent to defraud and there was no conspiracy to affect the 2016 election,” Blanche mentioned. “The proof doesn’t add up.”

Blanche advised the jury they can not convict Trump primarily based on Cohen’s testimony, recalling how Trump’s ex-attorney “took the stand after which lied.”

“The data are usually not false and there was no intent to defraud,” he mentioned.

Blanche mentioned not one single bill was despatched to Trump straight and that Cohen billed Trump “for companies rendered.” He additionally advised the jury Cohen rendered companies as Trump’s private lawyer in 2017.

The protection lawyer mentioned that even when the quantity of labor was minimal, there was a retainer settlement, which he defined is “how retainer agreements work.” Blanche mentioned Cohen was “on name for President Trump.”

Blanche additionally defined that checks to Cohen weren’t signed by Trump. 

“You may’t convict President Trump,” he mentioned. “As a result of typically President Trump appeared on the invoices … that could be a stretch and that’s affordable doubt.”

Choose Juan Merchan listens because the protection makes closing arguments throughout former President Trump’s legal trial in New York Metropolis on Might 28, 2024. (Reuters/Jane Rosenberg)

Blanche mentioned Cohen requested the jury to “ignore” paperwork and imagine he was keen to work without spending a dime. 

“Do you even imagine that for a second?” Blanche requested. 

Cohen had testified he was “reimbursed $420,000” for the $130,000 he paid to Daniels. Cohen mentioned former Trump Group CFO Allen Weisselberg recommended he “gross up” the funds and that Trump knew the small print of the reimbursement.

The prosecution introduced Cohen with 11 checks totaling $420,000. Cohen confirmed they had been all obtained and deposited. The checks had an outline of “retainer,” which Cohen mentioned was false.

Blanche mentioned the thought Trump would comply with pay Cohen $420,000 when he solely owed him $130,000 is “absurd,” and he added there isn’t any proof of “grossing it up” and no proof of a tax therapy. 

The protection lawyer went on to say that the prosecution has to show Trump “induced” these entries with the aim and intent to defraud, however he requested the jury, “The place is the intent to defraud?” 

NY V TRUMP: HOUSE GOP LAWMAKER URGES MERCHAN TO DISMISS CASE OVER ‘FATAL FLAWS,’ REFER TO FEC

Blanche mentioned there’s a tax kind, a 1099, to mirror the funds from a Trump private account to Cohen.

Protection lawyer Todd Blanche, left, presents closing arguments as Choose Juan Merchan presides throughout former President Trump’s legal trial in New York Metropolis on Might 28, 2024. (Reuters/Jane Rosenberg)

“There’s nothing false or deceptive about 1099,” he mentioned. “If there was a deep-rooted intent to defraud, why was it reported to the IRS as precisely what it was?”

As for the alleged “catch and kill” scheme with the Nationwide Enquirer, Blanche mentioned the preparations had been “completely authorized” and had been preparations that American Media Inc. (AMI), the corporate that owns the publication, has been practising for many years. 

“There’s nothing legal about Trump wanting constructive information tales. However the concept that constructive tales in [the] Nationwide Enquirer may affect [the] 2016 election is preposterous,” Blanche mentioned.

EX-TOP BIDEN DOJ OFFICIAL NOW PROSECUTING TRUMP WAS ONCE PAID BY DNC FOR ‘POLITICAL CONSULTING’

However Blanche did say that David Pecker, the AMI CEO, admitted he had “by no means heard” the time period “catch and kill.” 

“That is significant,” Blanche mentioned.

As for Cohen, Blanche mentioned “he’s the human embodiment of affordable doubt.”

Former President Trump listens as protection lawyer Todd Blanche presents closing arguments throughout Trump’s legal trial in New York Metropolis on Might 28, 2024. (Reuters/Jane Rosenberg)

“He lied to you repeatedly … he’s biased and motivated,” Blanche mentioned, including that the jury ought to desire a witness to inform the reality.

“Michael Cohen is the GLOAT,” Blanche mentioned. “He’s the best liar of all time … his phrases can’t be trusted … all these lies, put them to the aspect for only a second, that is sufficient to stroll away.”  

Blanche famous Cohen had lied to each Homes of Congress, federal judges, state judges and household.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“You can not ship somebody to jail primarily based upon the phrases of Michael Cohen,” Blanche mentioned, including {that a} verdict must be reached primarily based on proof from paperwork and witnesses. “For those who do this, this can be a very fast and straightforward not-guilty verdict.” 

NY v Trump: Protection says prosecutors ‘didn’t meet the burden of proof,’ former president is ‘harmless’

World Information,Subsequent Massive Factor in Public Knowledg

Share This Article